雅思寫作考試素材法院庭審電視直播雅思寫作素材

2024-07-05 18:36:28 來源：中國教育在線

雅思寫作考試素材：法院庭審電視直播,雅思寫作素材，關于這個問題的答案，你想知道嗎？下面中國教育在線小編就來為各位小伙伴解答分享一下，想要了解的話，那就話不多說，趕緊往下看。

雅思寫作考試素材：法院庭審電視直播,雅思寫作素材

雅思寫作，雅思寫作句型，雅思寫作句型盤點。今天小編給考生們了搜集整理了雅思寫作句型看點之法院庭審直播問題,希望對同學們的雅思寫作備考有所幫助，祝考生們備考順利，早日取得好成績!

2016.10.22 Task 2

In some countries, some criminal trials are shown on television and the general public can watch them.

Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?

看到這周的雅思寫作大作文話題，我立刻就想到了幾個月前新出的美劇《美國犯罪故事》。這部新劇的第一季講的就是前美國橄欖球明星OJ辛普森涉嫌殺妻的故事。這是一部根據(jù)真人真事改編的劇集，而在當時(1994年)整個的審訊過程也通過電視直播給美國市民，并引起了不小的轟動。

百度百科對此事是這樣說的：

通過電視轉(zhuǎn)播而家喻戶曉，人們對司法程序和法治的具體制度也有了直觀的了解，成了一種普及法律知識的最大課堂。電視臺是依靠收視率而生存的。報道的東西越有刺激性和爭議性，收視率便越高。名人涉嫌殺妻，電視臺大肆宣揚，唯恐有人不知。各大電視網(wǎng)均不遺余力地派出最強的記者現(xiàn)場采訪，而各種肥皂劇、喜劇和脫口秀也以法官、被告、控方、證人中的一些著名角色為題材大加發(fā)揮，熱鬧非凡，竭盡推波助瀾之能事。

好，接下來給大家分享一些關于法院庭審電視直播的一些素材：

有利(Advantages)：

if television cameras were allowed to broadcast the remarks made by judges when they pass sentence, it would go a long way to making the process more transparentand would dramatically improve public confidence in the system.

如果允許電視直播法官判決時的評論，在使法律程序透明化的方面上就會是一種長足的進步，而且也會提高公眾對法律體系的信任。

We should bring pressure to bear on all judges to open up their courtrooms to public scrutiny.

我們應該給所有的法官施加壓力，讓他們把自己的法庭對公眾開放，受公眾監(jiān)督。

...in a democracy the public has the right to see its institutions in operation, close-up.The video camera helps to keep the system honest by keeping it open and easily available to the public.

在一個民主的國家里，公眾有權力去近距離地觀看政府機構(gòu)是如何運轉(zhuǎn)的。攝像機讓我們的法律體系公開從而大眾可以了解它，這樣會讓法律體系誠實。

Being able to have access to the police testifying in court is very important. Lots of innocent people have been jailed based on the lies of the police.

公眾能夠看到警察在法庭提供證詞是非常重要的。很多的無辜者因為警察撒謊而入獄。

It could act as a deterrent.This could teach young adults about the law and what the consequences could be if they break the law.

電視直播會有威懾力。這樣可以讓年輕人了解法律，以及犯法會帶來的后果。

It would be a very educational experience as well because it would give the people a better understanding of the judiciary system.

電視直播也會有教育意義，因為它會讓人們更了解司法系統(tǒng)。

broadcast 廣播 transparent 透明的 public confidence 公眾信任 public scrutiny 公眾監(jiān)督 democracy 民主國家 institution 機構(gòu) close-up 近距離 have access to 可獲得 testify 作證 innocent 無罪的 jail 使入獄 deterrent 威懾物 judiciary 司法的

不利(Disadvantages):

the televised cases are only going to be those that draw in an audience because broadcasters are commercial animals. They need viewing figures.

電視直播的案件只會被用來吸引觀眾，電視臺就是以盈利為目的的東西。它們需要收視率。

Our mighty respect for the publics right to know has clouded our judgment. There may be no way to quantitatively prove that cameras influence courtroom behavior and, possibly, a trials outcome. But anyone whos ever sat in front of a camera knows that it is so.

我們對于公眾的知情權的過分尊重已經(jīng)蒙蔽了我們的判斷。我們可能無法量化地去證明攝像機會影響人們在法庭上的行為，甚至于審判結(jié)果。但任何一個有過鏡頭經(jīng)驗的人都會知道那是真的。

Criminals can profit from victims' suffering, by selling interviews, photos, books, film rights later.

罪犯會受益于受害者的不幸，因為他們事后可以通過賣采訪、照片、書籍、電影授權的方式獲取財富。

Everyone is presumed innocent initially and it is up to the prosecutor to prove guilt, so these people are not criminals at the point of the trial and have the right to privacy.

每個人在檢察官證明ta有罪之前都是無罪的。所以這些人在審訊期間并不是犯人，因此有隱私權。

Judges, jurors and attorneys end up playing for the camera when they should be concentrating on the case.

法官、陪審團及律師最終會在鏡頭前表演，但他們應該把重點放在案件本身。

Media has a way of swaying public opinion Lives of innocent people would be ruined if public opinion decided they were guilty even though a jury found them innocent due to lack of evidence.

媒體擅長操弄公眾意見。無辜者的生活會被毀掉如果大眾認為他們有罪，而陪審團由于證據(jù)不足判定他們無罪。

Television turns the entire process into a kind of legal reality TV, where popularity and emotion become the main arbiters of opinion.

電視會把整個司法過程變成法庭真人秀，流行和情緒會成為意見左右者。

televise 電視直播 draw in 吸引 the right to know 知情權 quantitatively 量化 presume 假定 prosecutor 檢察官 juror 陪審團人員 attorney 律師 sway 影響 arbiter 仲裁人

雅思作文欄目推薦閱讀:

雅思寫作高分經(jīng)驗

2016年雅思報名時間

雅思零基礎如何備考雅思

2016雅思考試時間安排表

2016全國各地雅思考點匯總

雅思寫作：餅圖的解題攻略

雅思寫作中的審題誤區(qū)解析