雅思雙邊討論類大作文教育類話題孩子應該盡早上學7分范文分析

隨著全球化的加速和教育的多樣化，越來越多的學生選擇留學，而在申請國外大學時，語言考試是繞不開的一環(huán)，本文和大家說一說：雅思雙邊討論類大作文教育類話題 孩子應該盡早上學 7分范文分析，一起往下來看看吧。

Nowadays some people say that children should go to school as young as possible. While others believe that children should go to school when they are at least seven years old. Discuss both views and give your own opinion. (題目來源：2019年12月14日亞太雅思大作文)

1、題目大意

有人認為孩子應該盡可能早的上學，而其他人認為孩子應該至少七歲以上才能上學討論雙方觀點并給與你個人觀點.

2、寫作思路

兩種觀點均缺乏合理性。

第一種觀點的不合理在于我們沒有辦法定性什么樣的學生情況可以被認定為是盡可能早?？赡苓@個概念太過模糊，即便相關的體系測試系統(tǒng)能夠檢測出孩子是否已經心智成熟到可以接受教育，也無法準確檢測他們是否可能在入學后長期專注，或者是過早接受教育會不會由于對他們童年時期自由度的過多限制而對未來產生影響。

雖然這意味著孩子應該被給與一個上學的年齡限制，但是這個限制也不應該太絕對?？茖W家和人類學家可能給予了一個很科學的7歲后上學的建議，但這個建議不應該是一個特別固定的狀態(tài)，因為它并沒有涵蓋對于不同地區(qū)孩子的具體情況，以及孩子在特定地區(qū)所獲得教育的具體內容。因而，固定的入學年齡應該在考量到這些決定因素后來被具體制定，可以略早也可以略晚。

3、提綱

4、高分范文

I would discuss in this essay why neither of the two views is persuasive enough, and I certainly agree that there should be a minimum age for the school access but it should not be always that fixed.

The suggestion that children should go to school as soon as possible would sound not so doable because of its ambiguity. It sounds reasonable that children are allowed to go to school when they are ready to accept rudimentary education mentally and physically, and that is why people think they are supposed to enjoy their study life as soon as possible. Whereas the only problem is that no one can define a system of differentiation towards this. Just what type of personal condition is possible enough to go to school? The quantification fails to be set up because of the obscurity of this definition. It is true that one could be testified with related examining system to ensure whether he or she is qualified enough to be injected with school knowledge and whether one has the basic logic thinking, but the related measurements can never be that sound to guarantee such kids can always focus on their schooling if put in primary education when they are too young, or even more severe, they would not deprived of their freedom in their early childhood and this would not be harmful to their future. If so, that is certainly not possible, and the potential hazards would be certainly hidden if the children were truly sent to school too soon.

The concern elicited above lead to why some consider the regulation of setting up a minimum age limit for children to go to school, but it, actually, should not be implemented too absolutely to be always seven. I have never doubted this restriction of age may have been examined by experts or anthropologists and it seems to be somewhat the most scientific period to provide most infants with elementary education since they may be mature enough to get access. However, would it be too strict a rule for the entire world to obey without including the consideration towards, say, the concrete contents of different types of education, or other tangible conditions of the next generations in specific locations? What the policy has failed to be practical is that it just has fixed the minimum age of students, but not unified the education modes or other related standards at the same time：rules could certainly be relaxed if the first-step education in a country is relatively easy involving mostly the playful elements that are suitable even if the education receivers are much younger; sometimes the limitation has to be more rigorous when children are inculcated with things that are above-average difficult.

In conclusion, I would agree that related criteria should indeed be given on what age is the best timing for schooling, but must be well-rounded enough by considering as many determinants as we can.

5、相關詞匯

Persuasive 有說服力的

Minimum age 最低年齡

Doable 可行的

Ambiguity 模糊的

Rigorous 嚴格的

以上就是“雅思雙邊討論類大作文教育類話題 孩子應該盡早上學 7分范文分析”的全部內容了，希望小編整理的資料能幫助到考生。如果想要了解更多相關資訊，歡迎關注外語頻道，為您提供更多精彩內容。

>> 雅思 托福 免費課程學習，AI量身規(guī)劃讓英語學習不再困難<<