您現(xiàn)在的位置:首頁 - 雅思 - 答疑

雅思大作文平均工作時(shí)間更長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家更成功寫作思路及范文

2024-07-02 11:25:04 來源:中國(guó)教育在線

雅思托福考試是一個(gè)非常有難度的考試,相信很多在備考階段的小伙伴們,每天都在關(guān)注一些雅思相關(guān)的消息。有同學(xué)問:雅思大作文 平均工作時(shí)間更長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家更成功 寫作思路及范文?今天,一起來看看吧。

雅思大作文 平均工作時(shí)間更長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家更成功 寫作思路及范文

觀點(diǎn)類大作文,社會(huì)類話題

Countries with a long average working time are more economically successful than those countries which do not have a long working time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

題目來源:2013年9月12日亞太雅思大作文

一、題目大意

平均工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)更長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家會(huì)比那些沒有很長(zhǎng)工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展更成功。你是否同意?

二、關(guān)鍵詞

economically successful 經(jīng)濟(jì)更加成功,這個(gè)成功的概念要去被定義。

average working time 平均工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)

三、寫作思路解析

工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)的長(zhǎng)短和經(jīng)濟(jì)成功度沒有直接關(guān)系,那些有著更長(zhǎng)工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家也不一定比那些沒有很長(zhǎng)工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)發(fā)展更成功:

1.工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)和經(jīng)濟(jì)成功沒有直接關(guān)系:經(jīng)濟(jì)成功的主要決定因素太過復(fù)雜,不可能由一個(gè)單一而且并不直觀的指標(biāo)來反映出來。一方面經(jīng)濟(jì)成功取決于其產(chǎn)業(yè)發(fā)達(dá)程度,另一方面,工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)的長(zhǎng)短可能反應(yīng)了勞動(dòng)力的發(fā)達(dá)程度:有些國(guó)家的工作時(shí)長(zhǎng)長(zhǎng)的原因恰恰是因?yàn)楣ぷ餍什蝗缒切┘夹g(shù)指向性的國(guó)家,而這也恰恰證明了時(shí)長(zhǎng)和國(guó)家經(jīng)濟(jì)成功度無關(guān)

2.經(jīng)濟(jì)方面的成功度本身也很難比較,因?yàn)楹茈y找到一個(gè)可信服的評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn):對(duì)于經(jīng)濟(jì)水平的測(cè)量方式站在不同立場(chǎng)上有所不同,因而也就很難從宏觀上客觀評(píng)定哪個(gè)國(guó)家的經(jīng)濟(jì)更加成功。

四、提綱梳理見下

五、高分寫作示范

I would argue in this essay that there is no necessary correlation between the average working time of a country and the economic success level of it and the irrationalities of the comparison made in this topic.

The economic standard of different nations and their working hours of labor forces are not proportional at all; the true reason lying behind the working time and the multiple factors leading to economic development compel the claim to be ridiculous. Before deciding whether an element contributes to an outcome, one should first see past the truth causing the elementon some cases, the long working time in a country may directly reflect the fact that its labor forces may be not as developed as that in other countries. That means they have to increase their working hours because they are not as efficient as those who are technologically prosperous in terms of the productivity. Such situation explains why time length cannot be a measurement in judging the economic success. Whereas the booming of the economy is also decided by many other cruxes like market-oriented industry, good transportation and the performance of securities, etc.; they are much more directly linked with the money flows and commercial situations and countries depend these types of factors more to develop their financial conditions no matter how long their citizens are working during their vocational life.

Before scrutinizing whether countries with or without long average working time can be compared in terms of their economic success, we must admit that it is not doable. For any appraisal to happen, one must first define the parameter in order to make a system of differentiation. Just what is the quantifying standard we consider to judge the economic successfulness of a country? Are we measuring the total GDP or per-capital GDP of a nation? Or are we verifying the CPI, or the amount of importation of exportation? Countries may largely vary in different criteria, and even if there are confirmed statistics, the conclusion is still unjustifiable because they cannot objectively reflect whether they are truly economically successfulthe total GDP may be high because of a large population, and a higher per-capital GDP may hide the wealth disparity inside; other measurements may still have problems like this. Though some countries may be manifest in the distance of economic prosperity, like the distance between the US and Cuba, there are great difficulties out there to be considered when comparing the countries that are not so different in their economic development; subjectivity prevails.

In conclusion, it is certainly simple-minded to add working time into the consideration of whether countries are more economically successful or not; nations are also certainly hard to be measured with the obscured definition of economic success.

六、相關(guān)詞匯和語法結(jié)構(gòu)

Correlation 關(guān)聯(lián)

Irrationality 不合理性

Proportional 成正比的

Compel 迫使

Prosperous 繁榮的

Crux 關(guān)鍵因素

Scrutinize 考量

Doable 可行的

Appraisal 評(píng)價(jià)

Parameter 評(píng)價(jià)標(biāo)準(zhǔn)

Quantify 量化

Verify 查驗(yàn)

Unjustifiable 公正的

通過上文的內(nèi)容介紹,大家對(duì)“雅思大作文 平均工作時(shí)間更長(zhǎng)的國(guó)家更成功 寫作思路及范文”大家是不是有了一個(gè)大致的了解呢?如果大家還想了解更詳細(xì)、更多的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,則可以繼續(xù)關(guān)注本頻道,也可以向本頻道咨詢。

>> 雅思 托福 免費(fèi)課程學(xué)習(xí),AI量身規(guī)劃讓英語學(xué)習(xí)不再困難<<

- 聲明 -

(一)由于考試政策等各方面情況的不斷調(diào)整與變化,本網(wǎng)站所提供的考試信息僅供參考,請(qǐng)以權(quán)威部門公布的正式信息為準(zhǔn)。

(二)本網(wǎng)站在文章內(nèi)容出處標(biāo)注為其他平臺(tái)的稿件均為轉(zhuǎn)載稿,轉(zhuǎn)載出于非商業(yè)性學(xué)習(xí)目的,歸原作者所有。如您對(duì)內(nèi)容、版 權(quán)等問題存在異議請(qǐng)與本站,會(huì)及時(shí)進(jìn)行處理解決。

語言考試咨詢
HOT
培訓(xùn)費(fèi)用測(cè)算
英語水平測(cè)試
1
免費(fèi)在線咨詢
免費(fèi)獲取留學(xué)方案