雅思寫作話題及范文:Write about the following topic:Governments should sp...

雅思寫作話題及范文:Write about the following topic:Governments should sp...

You should spend about 40 minutes on this task.

Write about the following topic:

Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Write at least 250 words.

您應該在這項任務上花費大約40分鐘。

寫下以下主題：

政府應該把錢花在鐵路而不是公路上。

你在多大程度上同意或不同意這一說法？

給出你的答案的理由，并包括你自己的知識或經(jīng)驗中的任何相關(guān)例子。

至少寫250個單詞。

范文

As far as I am concerned, governments have the responsibility to fund construction of infrastructure, no matter whether it is rails or roads as both modes of transport are invested with their own functions.

Investment in road schemes could carry immeasurable benefits to all road users including drivers, pedestrians and cyclists. This is primarily because smooth, smart and sustainable roads may decrease the likelihood of external social costs they entail such as congestion, accidents, pollution and depletion of oil resources, and so on. As well as reducing costs, roads surpass railways as they facilitate personal and goods transport in a more flexible and convenient way. Such flexibility and convenience could be further promoted with financial support from the government, which in turn prosper regional economy.

In contrast to road travel which enhances individual mobility at a relatively higher cost, railway transport has long been known as being cost-effective and being able to deliver large quantities of bulk materials and large queues of passengers in a swift way. Also noteworthy is that despite considerable loss of cropland in construction and occasional unpunctuality, railway transport is capable of carrying goods to those inaccessible faraway areas like mountainous regions or isolated wilderness regions. As a result of this, the investment in railway construction would to a large extent accelerate trade within or beyond national boundaries.

In both cases, besides boosting regional and national economy, the infuse of governmental fund into the construction of both modes of transport could boost the development of modern logistics, thereby creating more employment opportunities, and enhancing income opportunities.

All in all, both rails and roads make up the backbone of transport in a country, as a result of which, governments cannot afford to neglect either.

就我而言，政府有責任為基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施建設(shè)提供資金，無論是鐵路還是公路，因為這兩種運輸方式都有各自的功能。

對道路計劃的投資可以給所有道路使用者帶來不可估量的好處，包括司機、行人和自行車手。這主要是因為平坦、智能和可持續(xù)的道路可能會降低外部社會成本的可能性，例如擁堵、事故、污染和石油資源耗竭等。在降低成本的同時，公路也超越了鐵路，因為公路以更靈活、更便捷的方式便利了個人和貨物運輸。在政府的財政支持下，可以進一步促進這種靈活性和便利性，從而繁榮區(qū)域經(jīng)濟。

與以相對較高的成本提高個人機動性的公路運輸相比，鐵路運輸長期以來一直被認為具有成本效益，能夠快速運送大量散裝材料和大量排隊的乘客。同樣值得注意的是，盡管在建設(shè)過程中大量損失農(nóng)田，而且偶爾不準時，但鐵路運輸能夠?qū)⒇浳镞\送到偏遠地區(qū)，如山區(qū)或與世隔絕的荒野地區(qū)。因此，鐵路建設(shè)投資將在很大程度上加速國內(nèi)外貿(mào)易。

在這兩種情況下，除了促進區(qū)域和國家經(jīng)濟，政府資金注入兩種運輸方式的建設(shè)可以促進現(xiàn)代物流的發(fā)展，從而創(chuàng)造更多的就業(yè)機會，增加收入機會。

總之，鐵路和公路都是一個國家的交通支柱，因此，政府也不能忽視這一點。

>> 雅思 托福 免費測試、量身規(guī)劃、讓英語學習不再困難<<