雅思范文:貧富差距
2024-04-17 10:32:06 來(lái)源：中國(guó)教育在線
很多同學(xué)都很關(guān)注雅思范文:貧富差距這個(gè)問(wèn)題，那么接下來(lái)就跟著中國(guó)教育在線小編一起來(lái)看看吧，相信你通過(guò)以下的文章內(nèi)容就會(huì)有更深入的了解。
雅思范文:貧富差距篇一：科技加大貧富差距
Some people think technological development increases the gap between the rich and the poor, while others believe it has the opposite effects. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
支持前者
IT industry is the most sought--‐after (趨之若鶩的) area of business, therefore quite a few shareholders of IT companies become millionaires, billionaires and even zillionaires overnight, e.g. Bill Gates.
Modern technology has literally changed every corner of the world, and people’s lives basically revolve around it. Some people take advantage of it, amassing (積聚) wealth in a short period of time, e.g Mark Zuckerburg.
Technological tycoons and their shareholders monopolise social resource, e.g. opportunity for good education and well--‐paying investment, leaving the disadvantaged untended.
支持后者
Responding to the huge demand for technology, companies have to expand their scale, which created numerous well--‐paid job opportunities for engineers, programmers, salespeople, etc. 空中飛行只能由富人享受， 而不是窮人 (高科技量產(chǎn)后就能降低價(jià)格，被大眾接受)
The success of high--‐tech enterprises is an inspiring role model to people, which encourages the appearance of thousands of millions of money--‐making micro--‐enterprises, e.g. the C2C shops on Taobao.
Governments can make use of technology to benefit their people, e.g. they can exploit the internet service to deliver schooling online to remote areas, and they can redistribute the tax collected from profitable high--‐tech companies to impoverished people. 空中飛行只能由富人享受，而不是窮人(如果有政府補(bǔ)貼，會(huì)更容易普及;主要因?yàn)殛懙剡\(yùn)輸方式是火車(chē) ，而火車(chē)的發(fā)明早于飛機(jī) ，所以經(jīng)濟(jì)實(shí)力稍差的人會(huì)選擇做火車(chē) 。但 對(duì)于一些主要由島嶼組成的國(guó)家，便宜的飛行就可以建設(shè)起來(lái))
建議
Technology does not trigger the exploding of wealth gap, as long as the society and the government make proper use of it.
雅思范文:貧富差距篇二：技術(shù)對(duì)貧富差異的影響
題目：Some people believe the range of technology available to individuals today is increasing the gap between the poor and the rich. Others think it is having an opposite effect. Discuss these points of view. What is your opinion?
范文：The gap between the rich and the poor has been a problem that human beings put efforts to solve. One approach is to develop various technologies and techniques. Automobiles, for instance, are supposed to free those who use their physical power to move objects or people. However, the developments of technologies are said to increase the gap.
Those who claim that technologies have played important roles in decreasing the gaps between the have and the have-not are correct, only partly, because they see the issue with too enthusiastic eyes. They pay much attention to the power of technologies but seldom focus on the social elements that keep technologies from being truly positive to human well being. For example, the mobile phones as a new technology should greatly emancipate people from low effective paper and pencil pattern of communication. However, this technology has not played its supposed roles because mobile phones are totally controlled by the few haves in the society. In China, it is the CMCC which is believed to be profiteer without much human nature.
However, those who entirely attribute the increasing gaps between the rich and the poor to the development of technologies are also not convincing. They, like those discussed above, fail to see that it is not technologies but the distribution systems of the social resources that account much more. In any human societies, it is not the resources per se, but the political, economic, and even religious fabrics, that finally dictate how many and however poor or rich its population is.
In conclusion, the development of technology bears no direct cause-effect relationship with the gap between the rich and the poor.
雅思范文:貧富差距篇三：國(guó)家貧富差距
The wealth gap between 1st world countries and 3rd world countries seems to be increasing. How can we reduce this gap? Do you think that developed countries have a duty to assist developing countries in every way?
Model Answer:
Every day the rich countries in the world get richer and the poor countries get poorer. Can we reduce this gap? Of course we can. The question is whether the people in power want to do it?
Reducing the wealth gap can be achieved by cancelling third world debt, cancelling trade and farming subsidies so that third world countries can compete, getting rid of third world corruption and investing and building in third world countries using local people and skills and allowing them ownership of businesses. There are other things as well. Unfortunately there is no profit in business for first world countries to do these things. Some will do them but most will not. The ordinary man on the street wants things to be better for poorer countries and the politicians say that they will help but the politicians will in the end do what business tells them to do. Politicians also rightly feel they have a duty to protect their own countries and keeping economically dominant is part of this duty. Creating effective competition for their own country?s businesses is not part of what they are expected to do.
This then leads on to whether I believe that developed countries have a duty to help the developing countries. Yes, I do. As an individual I believe that we have a duty to assist the poorer countries with their development in all aspects. We can provide teachers and education and doctors on the small scale and on the larger scale the things that I have talked about in the previous paragraph. Can we do this? Yes. Will we do this? See the previous paragraph again.
In conclusion you can see that I believe that there is a split between what would happen in a perfect world and what actually happens. We have a duty to reduce the wealth gap between developed and developing countries and we can do it, but it is unlikely that this will happen quickly.
雅思寫(xiě)作：貧富差距
Some people think that the range of technology available to individuals is increasing the gap between rich countries and poor countries，while others hold the opposite opinion. What is your opinion? 一些人認(rèn)為科技導(dǎo)致貧富國(guó)差異越來(lái)越大，另外一些人持否定態(tài)度，你的觀點(diǎn)是什么?
思路提點(diǎn)
導(dǎo)致貧富差距
不是錢(qián)而是科技缺乏導(dǎo)致貧困 it is not money but technology that drives prosperity. 更甚，科技的缺乏使貧困無(wú)法擺脫。 poverty is driven and sustained by a lack of technology.
科技可以是掠奪資源的工具
Technology can be used as a tool of oppression. 一個(gè)國(guó)家的科技進(jìn)步(technological advancement) 使之對(duì)貧困國(guó)家的自然資源進(jìn)行掠奪(has allowed it to exploit natural resources)。富國(guó)的人才資本積累(the accumulation of intellectual capital) 使差距拉大(broaden this gap)， 因?yàn)樗麄兛刂屏讼冗M(jìn)的技術(shù) because it has enabled them to control technology
詞匯補(bǔ)充
人才資本積累the accumulation of intellectual capital
掠奪自然資源exploit natural resources
科技可以是掠奪資源的工具 technology can be used as a tool of oppression
科技進(jìn)步technological advancement
那么以上就是關(guān)于雅思范文:貧富差距的相關(guān)內(nèi)容啦，以上內(nèi)容作為參考分享給大家，希望能幫助到有需要的同學(xué)，如果還有更多想要了解的內(nèi)容可以關(guān)注本平臺(tái)繼續(xù)瀏覽。
>>免費(fèi)領(lǐng)全球留學(xué)白皮書(shū)，了解各大學(xué)報(bào)考條件、費(fèi)用、開(kāi)學(xué)時(shí)間、含金量<<
HOT
1
