您現(xiàn)在的位置:首頁(yè) - 留學(xué)考試

雅思范文考官

2024-04-14 13:30:17 來(lái)源:中國(guó)教育在線

很多同學(xué)都很關(guān)注雅思范文考官這個(gè)問(wèn)題,那么接下來(lái)就跟著中國(guó)教育在線小編一起來(lái)看看吧,相信你通過(guò)以下的文章內(nèi)容就會(huì)有更深入的了解。

雅思范文考官

雅思范文考官篇一:

題目:Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?

It is sometimes argued that tourists from overseas should be charged more than local residents to visit important sites and monuments. I completely disagree with this idea.

The argument in favour of higher prices for foreign tourists would be that cultural or historical attractions often depend on state subsidies to keep them going, which means that the resident population already pays money to these sites through the tax system. However, I believe this to be a very shortsighted view. Foreign tourists contribute to the economy of the host country with the money they spend on a wide range of goods and services, including food, souvenirs, accommodation and travel. The governments and inhabitants of every country should be happy to subsidise important tourist sites and encourage people from the rest of the world to visit them.

If travellers realised that they would have to pay more to visit historical and cultural attractions in a particular nation, they would perhaps decide not to go to that country on holiday. To take the UK as an example, the tourism industry and many related jobs rely on visitors coming to the country to see places like Windsor Castle or Saint Paul’s Cathedral. These two sites charge the same price regardless of nationality, and this helps to promote the nation’s cultural heritage. If overseas tourists stopped coming due to higher prices, there would be a risk of insufficient funding for the maintenance of these important buildings.

In conclusion, I believe that every effort should be made to attract tourists from overseas, and it would be counterproductive to make them pay more than local residents.

雅思范文考官篇二:

題目:Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity.Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is true that medicines and other products are routinely tested on animals before they are cleared for human use. While I tend towards the viewpoint that animal testing is morally wrong, I would have to support a limited amount of animal experimentation for the development of medicines.

On the one hand, there are clear ethical arguments against animal experimentation. To use a common example of this practice, laboratory mice may be given an illness so that the effectiveness of a new drug can be measured. Opponents of such research argue that humans have no right to subject animals to this kind of trauma, and that the lives of all creatures should be respected. They believe that the benefits to humans do not justify the suffering caused, and that scientists should use alternative methods of research.

On the other hand, reliable alternatives to animal experimentation may not always be available. Supporters of the use of animals in medical research believe that a certain amount of suffering on the part of mice or rats can be justified if human lives are saved. They argue that opponents of such research might feel differently if a member of their own families needed a medical treatment that had been developed through the use of animal experimentation. Personally, I agree with the banning of animal testing for non-medical products, but I feel that it may be a necessary evil where new drugs and medical procedures are concerned.

In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be wrong to ban testing on animals for vital medical research until equally effective alternatives have been developed.

雅思范文考官篇三:

題目:Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

范文:

When they finish school, teenagers face the dilemma of whether to get a job or continue their education. While there are some benefits to getting a job straight after school, I would argue that it is better to go to college or university.

The option to start work straight after school is attractive for several reasons. Many young people want to start earning money as soon as possible. In this way, they can become independent, and they will be able to afford their own house or start a family. In terms of their career, young people who decide to find work, rather than continue their studies, may progress more quickly. They will have the chance to gain real experience and learn practical skills related to their chosen profession. This may lead to promotions and a successful career.

On the other hand, I believe that it is more beneficial for students to continue their studies. Firstly, academic qualifications are required in many professions. For example, it is impossible to become a doctor, teacher or lawyer without having the relevant degree. As a result, university graduates have access to more and better job opportunities, and they tend to earn higher salaries than those with fewer qualifications. Secondly, the job market is becoming increasingly competitive, and sometimes there are hundreds of applicants for one position in a company. Young people who do not have qualifications from a university or college will not be able to compete.

For the reasons mentioned above, it seems to me that students are more likely to be successful in their careers if they continue their studies beyond school level.

雅思范文考官篇四:

題目:Several languages are in danger of extinction because they are spoken by very small numbers of people. Some people say that governments should spend public money on saving these languages, while others believe that would be a waste of money. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

通過(guò)上文的內(nèi)容介紹,大家對(duì)“雅思范文考官”大家是不是有了一個(gè)大致的了解呢?如果大家還想了解更詳細(xì)、更多的相關(guān)內(nèi)容,則可以繼續(xù)關(guān)注本頻道,也可以向本頻道咨詢。

>>免費(fèi)領(lǐng)全球留學(xué)白皮書,了解各大學(xué)報(bào)考條件、費(fèi)用、開學(xué)時(shí)間、含金量<<

- 聲明 -

(一)由于考試政策等各方面情況的不斷調(diào)整與變化,本網(wǎng)站所提供的考試信息僅供參考,請(qǐng)以權(quán)威部門公布的正式信息為準(zhǔn)。

(二)本網(wǎng)站在文章內(nèi)容出處標(biāo)注為其他平臺(tái)的稿件均為轉(zhuǎn)載稿,轉(zhuǎn)載出于非商業(yè)性學(xué)習(xí)目的,歸原作者所有。如您對(duì)內(nèi)容、版 權(quán)等問(wèn)題存在異議請(qǐng)與本站,會(huì)及時(shí)進(jìn)行處理解決。

免費(fèi)獲取留學(xué)方案
Kaplan, Inc. 30 多年來(lái)一直是Graham Holdings(前身為 The Washington Post Co.)的一部分,是其最大的子公司。Graham Holdings Co.(紐約證券交易所代碼:GHC)總部位于弗吉尼亞州阿靈頓,是一家多元化的教育和媒體公司,其主要業(yè)務(wù)包括教育服務(wù)、電視廣播....
HOT
留學(xué)費(fèi)用測(cè)算
免費(fèi)留學(xué)評(píng)估
1
免費(fèi)在線咨詢
免費(fèi)獲取留學(xué)方案